Hi,

This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:

Type: series
Message-id: 20180710000024.542612-1-...@redhat.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH hack dontapply v2 0/7] Dynamic _CST generation

=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash

BASE=base
n=1
total=$(git log --oneline $BASE.. | wc -l)
failed=0

git config --local diff.renamelimit 0
git config --local diff.renames True
git config --local diff.algorithm histogram

commits="$(git log --format=%H --reverse $BASE..)"
for c in $commits; do
    echo "Checking PATCH $n/$total: $(git log -n 1 --format=%s $c)..."
    if ! git show $c --format=email | ./scripts/checkpatch.pl --mailback -; then
        failed=1
        echo
    fi
    n=$((n+1))
done

exit $failed
=== TEST SCRIPT END ===

Updating 3c8cf5a9c21ff8782164d1def7f44bd888713384
From https://github.com/patchew-project/qemu
 t [tag update]            
patchew/20180626135035.133432-1-vsement...@virtuozzo.com -> 
patchew/20180626135035.133432-1-vsement...@virtuozzo.com
 * [new tag]               patchew/20180710000024.542612-1-...@redhat.com -> 
patchew/20180710000024.542612-1-...@redhat.com
Switched to a new branch 'test'
eea669947b pc: HACK: acpi: tie in _CST object to Processor
51455e6143 acpi: aml generation for _CST
be172c3f6f acpi: init header without linking
8986b8080b acpi: export acpi_checksum
3c7a978139 acpi: aml_load/aml_unload
4fc698863e acpi: generalize aml_package / aml_varpackage
75d0818dd8 acpi: aml: add aml_register()

=== OUTPUT BEGIN ===
Checking PATCH 1/7: acpi: aml: add aml_register()...
Checking PATCH 2/7: acpi: generalize aml_package / aml_varpackage...
Checking PATCH 3/7: acpi: aml_load/aml_unload...
Checking PATCH 4/7: acpi: export acpi_checksum...
Checking PATCH 5/7: acpi: init header without linking...
Checking PATCH 6/7: acpi: aml generation for _CST...
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#41: 
new file mode 100644

ERROR: trailing whitespace
#139: FILE: hw/acpi/cst.c:94:
+     * a good idea for future extensions.      $

ERROR: do not use C99 // comments
#150: FILE: hw/acpi/cst.c:105:
+    //table_data->data[cstp_offset] = 0x8; /* hack */

WARNING: line over 80 characters
#172: FILE: hw/acpi/cst.c:127:
+    acpi_init_header(dyn_ssdt_hdr, "SSDT", dyn_ssdt->buf->len, 1, NULL, 
"DYNSSDT");

WARNING: line over 80 characters
#185: FILE: hw/acpi/cst.c:140:
+static void cst_ioport_write(void *opaque, hwaddr addr, uint64_t data, 
unsigned size)

WARNING: line over 80 characters
#214: FILE: hw/acpi/cst.c:169:
+    memory_region_init_io(&cst_mr, NULL, &cst_ops, NULL, "cst-update-request", 
4);

total: 2 errors, 4 warnings, 187 lines checked

Your patch has style problems, please review.  If any of these errors
are false positives report them to the maintainer, see
CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

Checking PATCH 7/7: pc: HACK: acpi: tie in _CST object to Processor...
=== OUTPUT END ===

Test command exited with code: 1


---
Email generated automatically by Patchew [http://patchew.org/].
Please send your feedback to patchew-de...@redhat.com

Reply via email to