On Thu, 12 Jul 2018 07:01:34 +0200 Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On 12.07.2018 03:01, David Gibson wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 08:53:05PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > >> On Wed, 11 Jul 2018 16:26:19 +1000 > >> David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote: > >> > >>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 05:14:53PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > >>>> On Tue, 10 Jul 2018 16:42:48 +1000 > >>>> David Gibson <da...@gibson.dropbear.id.au> wrote: > >>>> > >>>>> On Tue, Jul 10, 2018 at 12:22:44PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>>> On Mon, 2 Jul 2018 16:26:44 +1000 > >>>>>> Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru> wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> The following changes since commit > >>>>>>> edb1fb337f65f82fe32b989c4f018efe85c1dddb: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> pseries: Update SLOF firmware image (2018-07-02 16:21:30 +1000) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> are available in the git repository at: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> g...@github.com:aik/qemu.git tags/qemu-slof-20180702 > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> for you to fetch changes up to > >>>>>>> edb1fb337f65f82fe32b989c4f018efe85c1dddb: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> pseries: Update SLOF firmware image (2018-07-02 16:21:30 +1000) > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------- > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> I just missed a couple of gcc 8.1 fixes and thought I can still > >>>>>>> squeeze > >>>>>>> them before the 3.0 soft freeze. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> *** Note: this is not for master, this is for pseries > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Not good for 3.1 either? > >>>>> > >>>>> Ugh.. somehow I missed this SLOF update request, and now we're in 3.0 > >>>>> hard freeze. > >>>>> > >>>>> How bad are the bugs this SLOF update fixes? > >>>> > >>>> These only fix gcc 8.1 warnings and runtime errors => not really > >>>> bugfixes so it is not a big deal if they miss 3.0. > >>> > >>> Ok, well, if you want to resend the update, I'll queue it for 3.1. > >> > >> > >> It is still on github, why resend? > > > > Good point, done. > > Won't there be another update in the 3.1 time frame? If yes, this sounds > like wasted space in the repository to me (the firmware blobs are rather > big, and there are no new features in that binary, just fixes for > compiling with GCC 8 ... and people who want to compile SLOF on their > own can use the sources from aik's git tree, too). I compiled the blob with gcc 8.1 and if something goes wrong I'd rather know this earlier than later - this my motivation, not the fixes themselves. -- Alexey
pgp1U7tPOt7gg.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
