On 16 July 2018 at 21:26, BALATON Zoltan <bala...@eik.bme.hu> wrote: > I could list sm501 in the sam460ex section thus formally taking > sub-maintainership but this would only go as far that I'll get cc-d on > changes and try to review them. I still can't (and don't want to) maintain > my own tree and send pull requests directly so I'd need someone's help with > that who can take my patches and merge them via their tree. If it's OK to > continue to use the PPC tree for that I'm fine with that if David agrees > (which I think he did above). > > So is it OK to add sm501 to sam460ex section so I claim responsibility for > changes and will continue sending patches cc-ing David (and maybe Gerd to > help spotting problems) then David could take these via the PPC tree?
I think that makes sense. sh4 is pretty dead and if sm501's major active user is the sam460ex then listing it there seems reasonable. thanks -- PMM
