On 25 July 2018 at 11:09, Hongbo Zhang <hongbo.zh...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 25 July 2018 at 17:01, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote: >> On 25 July 2018 at 10:48, Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> wrote: >>> On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 01:30:52PM +0800, Hongbo Zhang wrote: >>>> For the Aarch64, there is one machine 'virt', it is primarily meant to >>>> run on KVM and execute virtualization workloads, but we need an >>>> environment as faithful as possible to physical hardware, for supporting >>>> firmware and OS development for pysical Aarch64 machines. >>>> >>>> This patch introduces new machine type 'Enterprise' with main features: >>> >>> The 'enterprise' name is really awful - this is essentially a marketing >>> term completely devoid of any useful meaning. >>> >>> You had previously called this "sbsa" which IIUC was related to a real >>> world hardware specification that it was based on. IOW, I think this old >>> name was preferrable to calling it "enterprise". >>> >> >> I couldn't agree more. However, IIUC this change was made at the >> request of one of the reviewers, although I wasn't part of the >> discussion at that point, so I'm not sure who it was. >> >> Hongbo, could you please share a link to that discussion? >> >> Thanks, >> Ard. >> > > V1 discussion here: > https://www.mail-archive.com/qemu-devel@nongnu.org/msg545775.html >
So who asked for the sbsa -> enterprise change?
