On 25 July 2018 at 14:59, Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jul 25, 2018 at 01:47:00PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: >> Would iut make any sense to call the machine "refplatform" or "refboard" >> to indicate it is a generic reference platform, not specifically following >> any particular real impl, albeit influence by the sbsa spec. >> > > That would indeed stop me from whining about a machine model with an > 'sbsa' name not strictly implementing a minimal SBSA machine :-) >
I still don't get why only a minimal machine is worth considering, given that a real-world minimal SBSA machine is not capable of doing anything useful.
