On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 02:23:46PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: > On 07/26/18 13:13, Andrew Jones wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 26, 2018 at 12:56:22PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> On 26 July 2018 at 12:52, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > >>> On 26 July 2018 at 11:46, Andrew Jones <drjo...@redhat.com> wrote: > >>>> i440fx and q35 are specific machine types. 'sbsa' is a generic machine > >>>> type that conforms to the SBSA specification. If you weren't trying to > >>>> memory map AHCI and EHCI controllers, or if memory mapped AHCI and EHCI > >>>> controllers were mandated in the SBSA spec, then there wouldn't be > >>>> anything to discuss. But that's not the case. You're attempting to > >>>> hard code one instance of a generic class of SBSA machines, but then > >>>> just call it 'sbsa'. > >>> > >>> Modelling a 'generic SBSA machine' is not the goal here (I'm > >>> not sure that's even possible or useful), so let's just > >>> stipulate that we'll call the machine type something else > >>> and move on ? > >>> > >> > >> Fine with me. Care to suggest a name? :-) > >> > > > > Also fine by me, but I'm not going to suggest the name. I fear the > > backlash I'd receive after this mail thread! > > > > I suggest "showcase2018". (Dead serious.)
Further suggestions "refplatform" "sbsareference" "sbsademo" "phys" (physical counterpart to "virt") Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|