* Denis V. Lunev (d...@openvz.org) wrote:
> > I don't quite understand the last two paragraphs. > we are thinking right now to eliminate delay on regular IO > for migration. There is some thoughts and internal work in > progress. That is why I am worrying. What downtime are you typicaly seeing and what are you aiming for? It would be good if you could explain what you're planning to fix there so we can get a feel for it nearer the start of it rather than at the end of the reviewing! Dave > > > However, coming back to my question; it was really saying that > > normal guest IO during the end of the migration will cause > > a delay; I'm expecting that to be fairly unrelated to the size > > of the disk; more to do with workload; so I guess in your case > > the worry is the case of big large disks giving big large > > bitmaps. > > exactly! > > Den -- Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilb...@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
