From: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangr...@tencent.com>
As Peter pointed out:
| - xbzrle_counters.cache_miss is done in save_xbzrle_page(), so it's
| per-guest-page granularity
|
| - RAMState.iterations is done for each ram_find_and_save_block(), so
| it's per-host-page granularity
|
| An example is that when we migrate a 2M huge page in the guest, we
| will only increase the RAMState.iterations by 1 (since
| ram_find_and_save_block() will be called once), but we might increase
| xbzrle_counters.cache_miss for 2M/4K=512 times (we'll call
| save_xbzrle_page() that many times) if all the pages got cache miss.
| Then IMHO the cache miss rate will be 512/1=51200% (while it should
| actually be just 100% cache miss).
And he also suggested as xbzrle_counters.cache_miss_rate is the only
user of rs->iterations we can adapt it to count guest page numbers
After that, rename 'iterations' to 'handle_pages' to better reflect
its meaning
Suggested-by: Peter Xu <pet...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangr...@tencent.com>
---
migration/ram.c | 18 +++++++++---------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/migration/ram.c b/migration/ram.c
index 09be01dca2..bd7c18d1f9 100644
--- a/migration/ram.c
+++ b/migration/ram.c
@@ -300,10 +300,10 @@ struct RAMState {
uint64_t num_dirty_pages_period;
/* xbzrle misses since the beginning of the period */
uint64_t xbzrle_cache_miss_prev;
- /* number of iterations at the beginning of period */
- uint64_t iterations_prev;
- /* Iterations since start */
- uint64_t iterations;
+ /* total handled pages at the beginning of period */
+ uint64_t handle_pages_prev;
+ /* total handled pages since start */
+ uint64_t handle_pages;
/* number of dirty bits in the bitmap */
uint64_t migration_dirty_pages;
/* last dirty_sync_count we have seen */
@@ -1587,19 +1587,19 @@ uint64_t ram_pagesize_summary(void)
static void migration_update_rates(RAMState *rs, int64_t end_time)
{
- uint64_t iter_count = rs->iterations - rs->iterations_prev;
+ uint64_t page_count = rs->handle_pages - rs->handle_pages_prev;
/* calculate period counters */
ram_counters.dirty_pages_rate = rs->num_dirty_pages_period * 1000
/ (end_time - rs->time_last_bitmap_sync);
- if (!iter_count) {
+ if (!page_count) {
return;
}
if (migrate_use_xbzrle()) {
xbzrle_counters.cache_miss_rate = (double)(xbzrle_counters.cache_miss -
- rs->xbzrle_cache_miss_prev) / iter_count;
+ rs->xbzrle_cache_miss_prev) / page_count;
rs->xbzrle_cache_miss_prev = xbzrle_counters.cache_miss;
}
}
@@ -1657,7 +1657,7 @@ static void migration_bitmap_sync(RAMState *rs)
migration_update_rates(rs, end_time);
- rs->iterations_prev = rs->iterations;
+ rs->handle_pages_prev = rs->handle_pages;
/* reset period counters */
rs->time_last_bitmap_sync = end_time;
@@ -3209,7 +3209,7 @@ static int ram_save_iterate(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque)
break;
}
- rs->iterations++;
+ rs->handle_pages += pages;
/* we want to check in the 1st loop, just in case it was the 1st time
and we had to sync the dirty bitmap.
--
2.14.4
