Hi all.
1. bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area don't use hbitmap_next_zero and uses
inefficient loop instead. Let's improve it.
2. bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area don't handle unaligned offset and
max_offset correctly. I'm not sure that it is a real bug. But if it is,
we need these series in 3.0.
Details are in 04 commit message.
v2:
01: - improve comment
- s/bytes/count/
- fix forgotten function call in test
- introduce orig_size field here for HBitmap,
make checking in hbitmap_next_zero more effective and safe
02: new
03: - orig_size already introduced in 01
- fix hbitmap_next_dirty_area to not return value less than
offset on unaligned requests
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy (7):
dirty-bitmap: improve bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_zero
tests: add tests for hbitmap_next_zero with non-zero count parameter
dirty-bitmap: add bdrv_dirty_bitmap_next_dirty_area
block/mirror: fix and improve do_sync_target_write
Revert "block/dirty-bitmap: Add bdrv_dirty_iter_next_area"
Revert "test-hbitmap: Add non-advancing iter_next tests"
Revert "hbitmap: Add @advance param to hbitmap_iter_next()"
include/block/dirty-bitmap.h | 8 +++--
include/qemu/hbitmap.h | 30 ++++++++++++++----
block/backup.c | 4 +--
block/dirty-bitmap.c | 69 +++++++----------------------------------
block/mirror.c | 16 +++++-----
nbd/server.c | 2 +-
tests/test-hbitmap.c | 69 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
util/hbitmap.c | 73 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
8 files changed, 151 insertions(+), 120 deletions(-)
--
2.11.1
