On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 12:10:46PM +0200, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > Hi > > On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 9:51 AM Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Feedback welcome, > > > > > > ping > > > > Cherry-picked two patches for the ui pull request. > > thanks > > > > > What is the plan for the command line handling, specifically the patch > > tagged with HACK? > > The RFC libvirt series doesn't use it. > > However, it's very convenient for qemu command line users. Daniel > doesn't want g_shell_parse_argv(), but he would like the -object json: > command line form instead. I don't know what is the status about > supporting that syntax.
IIRC the last suggestion I saw was to not allow custom ARGV at all ? ie define a standard contract that all scripts must follow, as we have done with the ifup scripts. Regards, Daniel -- |: https://berrange.com -o- https://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange :| |: https://libvirt.org -o- https://fstop138.berrange.com :| |: https://entangle-photo.org -o- https://www.instagram.com/dberrange :|
