>> >>> * More trees to pull from. Of course, not every area needs a dedicated >>> tree (that would become silly pretty quickly), but for example a tcg >>> tree would be nice. I can still pick individual patches if a pull >>> request would be overkill. >>> * I'd also like to have a designated backup for the overall >>> maintainership, especially for when I'm on vacation (like the first >>> two weeks of September, just to let you know :) or otherwise >>> unavailable, but also for sanity. Likely needs to be a non-IBMer due >>> to the tcg problem. >> >> Is the current setup with Richard (TCG) and myself (KVM) not good enough? > > It's mostly "I'm uncomfortable that it's only me". Having the tcg > maintainers resp. you handle things is absolutely fine for the usual > run of things. The only time where there might be problems is if e.g. > tcg and kvm changes interact in a non-trivial way, but I expect these > to be very rare.
I wonder what kind of persons do things like that ;) But yes, it should be rare and usually can wait in case you are on vacation. -- Thanks, David / dhildenb
