On 9/21/18 3:28 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
monitor_resume() and monitor_suspend() both want to
"kick" the I/O thread if it is there, but in
monitor_suspend() lacked the use_io_thread flag condition.
This is required when we later only spawn the thread on
first use.
When sending a multi-patch series (yes, even two patches counts), it's
best to send a 0/2 cover letter, to make it easier for automated CI
tooling to recognize the series.
Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumil...@proxmox.com>
---
monitor.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>
diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
index 021c11b1bf..4802148c82 100644
--- a/monitor.c
+++ b/monitor.c
@@ -4380,7 +4380,7 @@ int monitor_suspend(Monitor *mon)
atomic_inc(&mon->suspend_cnt);
- if (monitor_is_qmp(mon)) {
+ if (monitor_is_qmp(mon) && mon->use_io_thread) {
/*
* Kick I/O thread to make sure this takes effect. It'll be
* evaluated again in prepare() of the watch object.
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org