On 9/21/18 3:28 AM, Wolfgang Bumiller wrote:
monitor_resume() and monitor_suspend() both want to
"kick" the I/O thread if it is there, but in
monitor_suspend() lacked the use_io_thread flag condition.
This is required when we later only spawn the thread on
first use.


When sending a multi-patch series (yes, even two patches counts), it's best to send a 0/2 cover letter, to make it easier for automated CI tooling to recognize the series.

Signed-off-by: Wolfgang Bumiller <w.bumil...@proxmox.com>
---
  monitor.c | 2 +-
  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <ebl...@redhat.com>


diff --git a/monitor.c b/monitor.c
index 021c11b1bf..4802148c82 100644
--- a/monitor.c
+++ b/monitor.c
@@ -4380,7 +4380,7 @@ int monitor_suspend(Monitor *mon)
atomic_inc(&mon->suspend_cnt); - if (monitor_is_qmp(mon)) {
+    if (monitor_is_qmp(mon) && mon->use_io_thread) {
          /*
           * Kick I/O thread to make sure this takes effect.  It'll be
           * evaluated again in prepare() of the watch object.


--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3266
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Reply via email to