On 1 October 2018 at 23:09, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org> wrote:
> The TYPE_EMPTY_SLOT and TYPE_UNIMPLEMENTED_DEVICE are identical devices,
> however the later use more recent APIs and is more widely used.
>
> Replace 'empty_slot' by 'unimplemented_device' to simplify devices code
> maintenance.
>
> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <f4...@amsat.org>
> ---

> @@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ static void niagara_init(MachineState *machine)
>          serial_mm_init(sysmem, NIAGARA_UART_BASE, 0, NULL, 115200,
>                         serial_hd(0), DEVICE_BIG_ENDIAN);
>      }
> -    empty_slot_init(NIAGARA_IOBBASE, NIAGARA_IOBSIZE);
> +    create_unimplemented_device("sun4v-iob", NIAGARA_IOBBASE, 
> NIAGARA_IOBSIZE);
>      sun4v_rtc_init(NIAGARA_RTC_BASE);
>  }

Is this actually an unimplemented (missing) device, or are we
implementing hardware-defined "no bus errors when this range is
touched" behaviour ?

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to