Emilio G. Cota <c...@braap.org> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 04, 2018 at 10:13:55 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote: >> >> Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> writes: >> >> > Changes from v1: >> > * Preserve udiv_qrnnd as a separate division primitive that >> > could be used as a building block for float128 division. >> > * Include asm fragments for x86_64, s390x, and ppc64. >> >> It passes my fops fdiv_double test but Emilio's test is reporting: >> >> Errors found in f64_div, rounding near_even: >> +252.7FFFFFFFFFF80 +001.FFFFFFFFFFFFE >> => +64F.7FFFFFFFFFF82 ....x expected +64F.7FFFFFFFFFF81 ....x > > Did you rebuild the test program? v2 passes all f64_div tests for me. > > Tested-by: Emilio G. Cota <c...@braap.org> > for patches 1 and 2. Hmm I did: make clean make in the tests/fp dir multiple times while going through before/after fix scenarios. And now of course it works.... Reviewed-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> Tested-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> > > Thanks, > > E. -- Alex Bennée
