On 6 October 2018 at 00:14, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <phi...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi Edgar,
>
> On 03/10/2018 17:07, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote:
>> From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" <edgar.igles...@xilinx.com>
>>
>> Add support for selecting the Memory Region that the GEM
>> will do DMA to.
>> @@ -1500,6 +1506,13 @@ static void gem_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error
>> **errp)
>> CadenceGEMState *s = CADENCE_GEM(dev);
>> int i;
>>
>> + if (s->dma_mr) {
>> + s->dma_as = g_malloc0(sizeof(AddressSpace));
>> + address_space_init(s->dma_as, s->dma_mr, NULL);
>> + } else {
>> + s->dma_as = &address_space_memory;
>> + }
>
> This is not the first time I see this if() block.
>
> Should we consider refactor it?
Given that there are only three users of the device in the tree,
I think the nicest cleanup would be to make those callers pass
in a suitable MemoryRegion (which could just be the system memory
MR), and make the "dma" property of the device mandatory to set.
We can do that as followup, though.
thanks
-- PMM
