On Thu, 18 Oct 2018 16:30:38 +0200
Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com> wrote:

> From: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.th...@huawei.com>
> 
> Generate Memory Affinity Structures for PC-DIMM ranges.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Shameer Kolothum <shameerali.kolothum.th...@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Eric Auger <eric.au...@redhat.com>
> 
> ---
> v3 -> v4:
> - do not use vms->bootinfo.device_memory_start/device_memory_size anymore
> 
> v1 -> v2:
> - build_srat_hotpluggable_memory movedc to aml-build
> ---
>  hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> index 5785fb697c..8818bbf5ec 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> @@ -545,6 +545,7 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, 
> VirtMachineState *vms)
>      int i, srat_start;
>      uint64_t mem_base;
>      MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_GET_CLASS(vms);
> +    MachineState *ms = MACHINE(vms);
>      const CPUArchIdList *cpu_list = mc->possible_cpu_arch_ids(MACHINE(vms));
>  
>      srat_start = table_data->len;
> @@ -570,6 +571,9 @@ build_srat(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker, 
> VirtMachineState *vms)
>          }
>      }
>  
> +    build_srat_hotpluggable_memory(table_data, ms->device_memory->base,
> +                                   ms->device_memory->mr.size, 0);
on x86, we use the last node here to make windows happy. I'd use the same value 
here.

> +
>      build_header(linker, table_data, (void *)(table_data->data + srat_start),
>                   "SRAT", table_data->len - srat_start, 3, NULL, NULL);
>  }


Reply via email to