On 02/28/2011 03:13 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 02/28/2011 10:57 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/28/2011 09:20 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
We should have another abstraction for connection based backend. I'll
take a go at this when I'm ready to try to get those patches in.
Shouldn't each new connection return a chardev?
You would need a kind of "factory" interface that knows how to create
a new {monitor,serial port,you name it} for each new connection.
Actually it doesn't make much sense except for monitors.
Monitors and vnc.
VNC also does it's own buffering when reading and writing to a file
descriptor. The chardev layer doesn't really have a concept of flow
control.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
