On 03/01/11 13:07, Dor Laor wrote: > On 02/28/2011 07:44 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote: >> I'm very nervous about having a large number of daemons necessary to run >> QEMU. I think a reasonable approach would be a single front-end daemond. > > s/daemon/son processes/ > Qemu is the one that should spawn them and they should be transparent > from the management. This way running qemu stays the same and qemu just > need to add the logic to get a SIGCHILD and potentially re-execute an > dead son process.
I disagree here, I do not want to require QEMU to spawn the new processes. Having a daemon you can use to connect will provide more flexibility and isn't unreasonably complex. Cheers, Jes
