On 2 March 2011 22:01, Stefan Weil <w...@mail.berlios.de> wrote:
> The part missing in my patch is correct handling of another
> rounding effect:
>
> VNC_DIRTY_WORDS is exact for 32 bit long values (and the
> "old" code which used uint32_t until some weeks ago), where
> VNC_DIRTY_WORDS = 2560/16/32 = 5.
>
> For 64 bit values, VNC_DIRTY_WORDS = 2560/16/64 = 2 (rounded)!
Yes, I noticed that after I posted. Given that we have arrays
like
unsigned long dirty[VNC_MAX_HEIGHT][VNC_DIRTY_WORDS];
rounding down rather than up looks a bit suspicious...
(Can we just make VNC_MAX_WIDTH a multiple of 64, or is it
baked into the VNC protocol?)
-- PMM
