Coverity complains (CID 1005726) that we might pass -1 as the fd argument to send() in slirp_send(), because we previously checked for "so->s == -1 && so->extra". The case of "so->s == -1 but so->extra NULL" should not in theory happen, but it is hard to guarantee because various places in the code do so->s = qemu_socket(...) and so will end up with so->s == -1 on failure, and not all the paths which call that always throw away the socket in that case (eg tcp_fconnect()). So just check specifically for the condition and fail slirp_send().
Signed-off-by: Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> --- This is to some extent just placating Coverity. --- slirp/slirp.c | 11 +++++++++++ 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+) diff --git a/slirp/slirp.c b/slirp/slirp.c index 51de41fc021..3c3c03b22f7 100644 --- a/slirp/slirp.c +++ b/slirp/slirp.c @@ -1091,6 +1091,17 @@ ssize_t slirp_send(struct socket *so, const void *buf, size_t len, int flags) return len; } + if (so->s == -1) { + /* + * This should in theory not happen but it is hard to be + * sure because some code paths will end up with so->s == -1 + * on a failure but don't dispose of the struct socket. + * Check specifically, so we don't pass -1 to send(). + */ + errno = EBADF; + return -1; + } + return send(so->s, buf, len, flags); } -- 2.19.1