On Mon, 5 Nov 2018 02:40:26 +0100
Samuel Ortiz <sa...@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> For both x86 and ARM architectures, the internal RSDP build API can
> return void as the current return value is unused.
>
> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sa...@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imamm...@redhat.com>
> ---
> hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c | 4 +---
> hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 4 +---
> 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> index f28a2faa53..fc59cce769 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/virt-acpi-build.c
> @@ -367,7 +367,7 @@ static void acpi_dsdt_add_power_button(Aml *scope)
> }
>
> /* RSDP */
> -static GArray *
> +static void
> build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, unsigned xsdt_tbl_offset)
> {
> AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp = acpi_data_push(rsdp_table, sizeof *rsdp);
> @@ -392,8 +392,6 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker,
> unsigned xsdt_tbl_offset)
> bios_linker_loader_add_checksum(linker, ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE,
> (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data, sizeof *rsdp,
> (char *)&rsdp->checksum - rsdp_table->data);
> -
> - return rsdp_table;
> }
>
> static void
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 81d98fa34f..74419d0663 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -2513,7 +2513,7 @@ build_amd_iommu(GArray *table_data, BIOSLinker *linker)
> "IVRS", table_data->len - iommu_start, 1, NULL, NULL);
> }
>
> -static GArray *
> +static void
> build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker, unsigned rsdt_tbl_offset)
> {
> AcpiRsdpDescriptor *rsdp = acpi_data_push(rsdp_table, sizeof *rsdp);
> @@ -2535,8 +2535,6 @@ build_rsdp(GArray *rsdp_table, BIOSLinker *linker,
> unsigned rsdt_tbl_offset)
> bios_linker_loader_add_checksum(linker, ACPI_BUILD_RSDP_FILE,
> (char *)rsdp - rsdp_table->data, sizeof *rsdp,
> (char *)&rsdp->checksum - rsdp_table->data);
> -
> - return rsdp_table;
> }
>
> static bool acpi_get_mcfg(AcpiMcfgInfo *mcfg)
