Am 07.03.2011 um 10:56 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
On Mon, Mar 07, 2011 at 01:34:13AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
v5:
* Initial.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber <andreas.faer...@web.de>
---
fpu/softfloat-native.c | 26 +++++++++++++-------------
fpu/softfloat-native.h | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
fpu/softfloat.c | 4 ++--
3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fpu/softfloat-native.h b/fpu/softfloat-native.h
index 6cf5dc3..b198f48 100644
--- a/fpu/softfloat-native.h
+++ b/fpu/softfloat-native.h
@@ -392,8 +392,8 @@ INLINE float64 float64_scalbn(float64 a, int n)
*----------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
int_fast32_t floatx80_to_int32( floatx80 STATUS_PARAM );
int_fast32_t floatx80_to_int32_round_to_zero( floatx80
STATUS_PARAM );
-int64_t floatx80_to_int64( floatx80 STATUS_PARAM);
-int64_t floatx80_to_int64_round_to_zero( floatx80 STATUS_PARAM);
+int64_fast_t floatx80_to_int64( floatx80 STATUS_PARAM);
+int64_fast_t floatx80_to_int64_round_to_zero( floatx80
STATUS_PARAM);
This type doesn't exist, so the code doesn't even compile...
I did compile-tested these, so apparently my host or targets do not
use softfloat-native... It was late so I can't rule out other mistakes
there.
Would you prefer to treat softfloat-native as a separate API and not
touch it in this series?
Andreas
