On 27/11/18 10:18, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 27/11/18 09:59, Markus Armbruster wrote: >>>> LINUX >>>> -L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>>> S: Maintained >>>> F: linux-* > > This pattern only matches > > ./block/linux-aio.c > ./stubs/linux-aio.c > > so it can be removed >
OK >>>> F: linux-headers/ > > For this I propose mst, Conny and myself. Or remove... I'll let them opinate. > >>>> POSIX >>>> -L: qemu-devel@nongnu.org >>>> S: Maintained >>>> F: *posix* >>> >>> I agree that we can remove the "L: qemu-devel" entries everywhere, but >>> for these subsystems that have no "M:" entry, but "S: Maintained", this >>> now looks somewhat strange - the subsystem is "Maintained" but has no >>> maintainer? I think we need somebody who feels responsible to pick up >>> patches here...? >> >> It looks strange because it *is* strange. If we take the definition of >> S: in MAINTAINERS seriously, we need to appoint a maintainer (a person, >> not a mailing list), or downgrade to S: Orphan. > > I can volunteer for this one too, but please change the F: patterns to > > F: os-posix.c > F: include/sysemu/os-posix.h > F: util/*posix*.c > F: include/qemu/*posix*.h OK, will do. Thanks Paolo, Phil. > > Thanks, > > Paolo >
