On 03/09/2011 07:58 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 03/07/2011 09:10 PM, Michael Roth wrote:
This allows us to implement an i/o loop outside of vl.c that can
interact with objects that use qemu_set_fd_handler()

I must say I really dislike the patches 1..3. It's _really_ getting the QEMU NIH worse. While it is not really possible to get a new shiny mainloop infrastructure in QEMU like snapping fingers (and I'm not sure the glib mainloop will ever happen there), there is no reason not to adopt glib's infrastructure in virtagent.

I'm 90% in agreement with you but in terms of delivering a Windows guest agent, instead of just having an exe, we're now talking about quite a few extra DLLs. It's not a huge problem and probably makes a ton of sense if virt-agent ever adopts more sophisticated functionality but I wanted to at least raise this point.

Regards,

Anthony Liguori

While cooperation between QEMU and virtagent is close, it is IMHO a substantially separate project that can afford starting from a clean slate.

If anybody disagrees, I'd be happy to hear their opinion anyway!

I'm sorry I'm saying this only now and I've been ignoring this series until v7.

Paolo




Reply via email to