>v10 --> v11 >change configure interface in virt machine configure parameters. > >v11 --> v12 >realize pvpanic as a pci device and use the mmio of pci device. > >Philippe Mathieu-Daudé (2): >hw/misc/pvpanic: Build the pvpanic device in $(common-obj) >hw/misc/pvpanic: Cosmetic renaming > >Peng Hao (3): >pvpanic : update pvpanic document >hw/arm/virt: Use the pvpanic device >pvpanic: add mmio interface as a pci device Hi , I resubmit a series patches for realizeing pvpanic as a pci device. and I want to confirm if these patches meet the requirements. I know there are still some imperfections in this series of patches, such as how to avoid x86/pvpanic using ISA/pvpanic and PCI/pvpanic at the same time. But I want to confirm if there is a problem with the overall direction of implementation as a PCI device.Then I can resubmit patches to kernel for replacing the previous ones.
Thanks.
