On Mon, 10 Dec 2018 at 13:32, Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilb...@redhat.com> wrote: > Is the problem here that the field could actually be misaligned (on > any conceivable build) or is it just a matter of convincing clang it's > safe?
This is mostly a "clang doesn't know that the struct field will actually always be 4 aligned and the function being called only requires 4 alignment" thing. But there is an actual-in-theory problem too: because the SCHIB struct is marked QEMU_PACKED it has no alignment requirements at all. So in for instance css_do_msch() the compiler is entitled to align the local "SCHIB schib" at any alignment it likes, which may not be the 4-alignment that copy_pmcw_from_guest() assumes. An option (3) which I hadn't previously thought of: copy the pmcw and scsw fields into and out of locals which are guaranteed to be correctly aligned: --- a/hw/s390x/css.c +++ b/hw/s390x/css.c @@ -1290,9 +1290,15 @@ void copy_scsw_to_guest(SCSW *dest, const SCSW *src) static void copy_schib_to_guest(SCHIB *dest, const SCHIB *src) { int i; + PMCW srcpmcw, destpmcw; + SCSW srcscsw, destscsw; - copy_pmcw_to_guest(&dest->pmcw, &src->pmcw); - copy_scsw_to_guest(&dest->scsw, &src->scsw); + srcpmcw = src->pmcw; + copy_pmcw_to_guest(&destpmcw, &srcpmcw); + dest->pmcw = destpmcw; + srcscsw = src->scsw; + copy_scsw_to_guest(&destscsw, &srcscsw); + dest->scsw = destscsw; dest->mba = cpu_to_be64(src->mba); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dest->mda); i++) { dest->mda[i] = src->mda[i]; @@ -1339,9 +1345,15 @@ static void copy_scsw_from_guest(SCSW *dest, const SCSW *src) static void copy_schib_from_guest(SCHIB *dest, const SCHIB *src) { int i; + PMCW srcpmcw, destpmcw; + SCSW srcscsw, destscsw; - copy_pmcw_from_guest(&dest->pmcw, &src->pmcw); - copy_scsw_from_guest(&dest->scsw, &src->scsw); + srcpmcw = src->pmcw; + copy_pmcw_from_guest(&destpmcw, &srcpmcw); + dest->pmcw = destpmcw; + srcscsw = src->scsw; + copy_scsw_from_guest(&destscsw, &srcscsw); + dest->scsw = destscsw; dest->mba = be64_to_cpu(src->mba); for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(dest->mda); i++) { dest->mda[i] = src->mda[i]; thanks -- PMM