On 11.03.2011, at 07:26, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 5:55 AM, Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de> wrote:
>>
>> On 17.02.2011, at 22:01, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>
>>> On 2011-02-07 12:19, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>>> We do not check them, and the only arch with non-empty implementations
>>>> always returns 0 (this is also true for qemu-kvm).
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kis...@siemens.com>
>>>> CC: Alexander Graf <ag...@suse.de>
>>>> ---
>>>> kvm.h | 5 ++---
>>>> target-i386/kvm.c | 8 ++------
>>>> target-ppc/kvm.c | 6 ++----
>>>> target-s390x/kvm.c | 6 ++----
>>>> 4 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>
>>> ...
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/target-ppc/kvm.c b/target-ppc/kvm.c
>>>> index 93ecc57..bd4012a 100644
>>>> --- a/target-ppc/kvm.c
>>>> +++ b/target-ppc/kvm.c
>>>> @@ -256,14 +256,12 @@ int kvm_arch_pre_run(CPUState *env, struct kvm_run
>>>> *run)
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -int kvm_arch_post_run(CPUState *env, struct kvm_run *run)
>>>> +void kvm_arch_post_run(CPUState *env, struct kvm_run *run)
>>>> {
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -int kvm_arch_process_irqchip_events(CPUState *env)
>>>> +void kvm_arch_process_irqchip_events(CPUState *env)
>>>> {
>>>> - return 0;
>>>> }
>>>
>>> Oops. Do we already have a built-bot for KVM-enabled PPC (and s390)
>>> targets somewhere?
>>
>> Just before leaving for vacation I prepared a machine for each and gave
>> stefan access to them. Looks like they're not officially running though -
>> will try to look at this asap.
>
> They are in the process of being added to the buildbot by Daniel
> Gollub. However, the ppc box is unable to build qemu.git because it
> hits ENOMEM while compiling. I doubled swap size but that didn't fix
> the issue so I need to investigate more. At least s390 should be good
Hrm, yeah. I hit that one too just before I left. Maybe I should just search
for another RAM bar :).
> to go soon and I will send an update when it is up and running.
Thanks!
Alex
