Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes: [...] > Honestly I'd probably prefer these methods to take an "Error **errp" > and propagate to the caller but that's alot more work.
I'd rather return 0 on success, -errno on failure in these cases.
Daniel P. Berrangé <berra...@redhat.com> writes: [...] > Honestly I'd probably prefer these methods to take an "Error **errp" > and propagate to the caller but that's alot more work.
I'd rather return 0 on success, -errno on failure in these cases.