I didn't get this fix pushed back into the patch set that I actually
sent last week. The patch is in target-arm.next, and I'm sure you
would have eventually seen the error in testing.
r~
---
target/arm/kvm64.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/target/arm/kvm64.c b/target/arm/kvm64.c
index ad83e1479c..089af9c5f0 100644
--- a/target/arm/kvm64.c
+++ b/target/arm/kvm64.c
@@ -538,9 +538,9 @@ bool kvm_arm_get_host_cpu_features(ARMHostCPUFeatures *ahcf)
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 6, 0));
err |= read_sys_reg64(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_aa64isar1,
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 6, 1));
- err |= read_sys_reg64(fdarray[2], &achf->isar.id_aa64mmfr0,
+ err |= read_sys_reg64(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_aa64mmfr0,
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 7, 0));
- err |= read_sys_reg64(fdarray[2], &achf->isar.id_aa64mmfr1,
+ err |= read_sys_reg64(fdarray[2], &ahcf->isar.id_aa64mmfr1,
ARM64_SYS_REG(3, 0, 0, 7, 1));
/*
--
2.17.2
