On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 13:35, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
>
> The API of cpu_physical_memory_write_rom() is odd, because it
> takes an AddressSpace, unlike all the other cpu_physical_memory_*
> access functions. We note this oddity as a TODO in the
> docs/devel/loads-stores.rst documentation.
>
> Rename cpu_physical_memory_write_rom() to address_space_write_rom(),
> and give it an API that matches address_space_write().
> We also adjest the cpu_physical_memory_write_rom_internal()
> function which is local to exec.c similarly.

Unless somebody would prefer a different route, I'm going
to add this series to a 'misc' pullreq I'm putting together.

thanks
-- PMM

Reply via email to