On Thu, 22 Nov 2018 at 13:35, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > > The API of cpu_physical_memory_write_rom() is odd, because it > takes an AddressSpace, unlike all the other cpu_physical_memory_* > access functions. We note this oddity as a TODO in the > docs/devel/loads-stores.rst documentation. > > Rename cpu_physical_memory_write_rom() to address_space_write_rom(), > and give it an API that matches address_space_write(). > We also adjest the cpu_physical_memory_write_rom_internal() > function which is local to exec.c similarly.
Unless somebody would prefer a different route, I'm going to add this series to a 'misc' pullreq I'm putting together. thanks -- PMM