Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes:

> On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 06:25:06PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes:
>> 
>> > On Mon, Dec 03, 2018 at 03:17:06PM +0100, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> >> Eduardo Habkost <ehabk...@redhat.com> writes:
>> > [...]
>> >> > But note that we might still be able to move the existing
>> >> > "hyperv_*" features to feature_word_info[].feat_names.  We just
>> >> > need to keep the same semantics (e.g. enable
>> >> > HV_HYPERCALL_AVAILABLE automatically when some features are set).
>> >> >
>> >> > Maybe we can make some of the feature properties read-only.  This
>> >> > way we can give them meaningful names for debugging and error
>> >> > messages, even if we don't want to make them configurable
>> >> > directly.
>> >> 
>> >> I'd suggest (if there are no objections of course) we do this separately
>> >> from this patch. [...]
>> >
>> > Agreed.
>> >
>> 
>> Paolo, Eduardo,
>> 
>> in case there are no concerns here, could you please pick this patch up?
>> Thanks!
>
> Queued, thanks!
>
> Can you please send the comment you wrote about feat_names as a
> follow-up patch?

Oops, sorry, I just realized I promissed to send out v2 with it and
aparently never did. Will send out a follow-up patch shortly. Thanks!

-- 
Vitaly

Reply via email to