On Thu, Dec 06, 2018 at 10:32:11AM +0800, Li Zhijian wrote:
> Don't expect read(2) can always read as many as it's told.
>
> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhij...@cn.fujitsu.com>
> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org>
This is more a theoretical bugfix than a refactoring right?
> ---
> V4: add reviewed-by tag
> ---
> hw/core/loader.c | 11 +++++------
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/hw/core/loader.c b/hw/core/loader.c
> index fa41842..9cbceab 100644
> --- a/hw/core/loader.c
> +++ b/hw/core/loader.c
> @@ -77,21 +77,20 @@ int64_t get_image_size(const char *filename)
> ssize_t load_image_size(const char *filename, void *addr, size_t size)
> {
> int fd;
> - ssize_t actsize;
> + ssize_t actsize, l = 0;
>
> fd = open(filename, O_RDONLY | O_BINARY);
> if (fd < 0) {
> return -1;
> }
>
> - actsize = read(fd, addr, size);
> - if (actsize < 0) {
> - close(fd);
> - return -1;
> + while ((actsize = read(fd, addr + l, size - l)) > 0) {
> + l += actsize;
> }
> +
> close(fd);
>
> - return actsize;
> + return actsize < 0 ? -1 : l;
> }
>
> /* read()-like version */
> --
> 2.7.4
