On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 09:20:43PM +0200, Blue Swirl wrote: > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 3:44 PM, Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com> wrote: > > Currently when rogue script kills QEMU process (using TERM/INT/HUP > > signal) it looks indistinguishable from system shutdown. Lets report > > that QMEU was killed and leave some clues about the killed identity. > > QEMU ;-) > Eah and second "killed" should be "killer". Why can't spell checker be smarter.
> > > > Signed-off-by: Gleb Natapov <g...@redhat.com> > > --- > > v1->v2: > > - print message from a main loop instead of signal handler > > > > diff --git a/os-posix.c b/os-posix.c > > index 38c29d1..36d937c 100644 > > --- a/os-posix.c > > +++ b/os-posix.c > > @@ -61,9 +61,9 @@ void os_setup_early_signal_handling(void) > > sigaction(SIGPIPE, &act, NULL); > > } > > > > -static void termsig_handler(int signal) > > +static void termsig_handler(int signal, siginfo_t *info, void *c) > > { > > - qemu_system_shutdown_request(); > > + qemu_system_killed(info->si_signo, info->si_pid); > > } > > > > static void sigchld_handler(int signal) > > @@ -76,7 +76,8 @@ void os_setup_signal_handling(void) > > struct sigaction act; > > > > memset(&act, 0, sizeof(act)); > > - act.sa_handler = termsig_handler; > > + act.sa_sigaction = termsig_handler; > > + act.sa_flags = SA_SIGINFO; > > sigaction(SIGINT, &act, NULL); > > sigaction(SIGHUP, &act, NULL); > > sigaction(SIGTERM, &act, NULL); > > diff --git a/sysemu.h b/sysemu.h > > index 0a83ab9..fc7048a 100644 > > --- a/sysemu.h > > +++ b/sysemu.h > > @@ -66,6 +66,8 @@ void qemu_system_vmstop_request(int reason); > > int qemu_shutdown_requested(void); > > int qemu_reset_requested(void); > > int qemu_powerdown_requested(void); > > +void qemu_system_killed(int signal, int pid); > > pid_t pid > OK. > > +void qemu_kill_report(void); > > extern qemu_irq qemu_system_powerdown; > > void qemu_system_reset(void); > > > > diff --git a/vl.c b/vl.c > > index 5e007a7..d14c42d 100644 > > --- a/vl.c > > +++ b/vl.c > > @@ -1213,7 +1213,7 @@ typedef struct QEMUResetEntry { > > static QTAILQ_HEAD(reset_handlers, QEMUResetEntry) reset_handlers = > > QTAILQ_HEAD_INITIALIZER(reset_handlers); > > static int reset_requested; > > -static int shutdown_requested; > > +static int shutdown_requested, shutdown_signal = -1, shutdown_pid; > > static pid_t shutdown_pid; > > > static int powerdown_requested; > > static int debug_requested; > > static int vmstop_requested; > > @@ -1225,6 +1225,15 @@ int qemu_shutdown_requested(void) > > return r; > > } > > > > +void qemu_kill_report(void) > > +{ > > + if (shutdown_signal != -1) { > > + fprintf(stderr, "Got signal %d from pid %d\n", > > Are there any systems with 64 bit pid_t? Then a cast may be needed > and/or format adjusted. > Doubt there are any. > > + shutdown_signal, shutdown_pid); > > + shutdown_signal = -1; > > + } > > +} > > + > > int qemu_reset_requested(void) > > { > > int r = reset_requested; > > @@ -1298,6 +1307,13 @@ void qemu_system_reset_request(void) > > qemu_notify_event(); > > } > > > > +void qemu_system_killed(int signal, int pid) > > pid_t pid -- Gleb.