From: "Emilio G. Cota" <c...@braap.org> The second test in the branches is wrong; fix while converting to a switch statement, which is easier to get right.
Signed-off-by: Emilio G. Cota <c...@braap.org> Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.hender...@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée <alex.ben...@linaro.org> --- tests/fp/fp-bench.c | 11 ++++++++--- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/tests/fp/fp-bench.c b/tests/fp/fp-bench.c index f5bc5edebf..546bac9c9c 100644 --- a/tests/fp/fp-bench.c +++ b/tests/fp/fp-bench.c @@ -143,15 +143,20 @@ static void update_random_ops(int n_ops, enum precision prec) for (i = 0; i < n_ops; i++) { uint64_t r = random_ops[i]; - if (prec == PREC_SINGLE || PREC_FLOAT32) { + switch (prec) { + case PREC_SINGLE: + case PREC_FLOAT32: do { r = xorshift64star(r); } while (!float32_is_normal(r)); - } else if (prec == PREC_DOUBLE || PREC_FLOAT64) { + break; + case PREC_DOUBLE: + case PREC_FLOAT64: do { r = xorshift64star(r); } while (!float64_is_normal(r)); - } else { + break; + default: g_assert_not_reached(); } random_ops[i] = r; -- 2.17.1