On 1/10/19 1:26 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 1/10/19 1:18 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
>> Patches speak louder than words.  This is my counter-proposal to
>> Leonid's thread on how best to respresent the S_*iB macros in units.h,
>> where my proposal is that we don't need them at all. (hence my subject
>> line, even though it is completely unrelated to the series)
>>
>> True, my diffstat is even bigger, but I think it is more maintainable
>> in the long run (if calling QemuOpts maintainable is even appropriate).
> 
> I wasn't brave enough to assert that def_value_str was used only with
> QEMU_OPT_STRING, and that all uses of QEMU_OPT_{BOOL,NUMBER,SIZE} with a
> default value are either defaulting to 0 or using def_value_int; that's
> a bigger auditing task followup that could be given as a BiteSizedTask,
> if you like this series.

Hmm - I wonder if Coccinelle is powerful enough to find all QemuOptDesc
initializers that .type to something other than QEMU_OPT_STRING and also
set .def_value_str; including initializers that did not use C99
named-member initialization (if we have any of those). (Those are the
candidates to start using .def_value_int)

-- 
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc.           +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization:  qemu.org | libvirt.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to