On 25/01/19 16:06, Thomas Huth wrote: >> -obj-y += boot.o virt.o sysbus-fdt.o >> +obj-y += boot.o sysbus-fdt.o >> +obj-$(CONFIG_VIRT) += virt.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += virt-acpi-build.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_DIGIC) += digic_boards.o >> obj-$(CONFIG_EXYNOS4) += exynos4_boards.o > <bikeshedding> > Maybe we should rather name that option CONFIG_ARM_VIRT, since other > targets like riscv have also a "virt" machine? > </bikeshedding>
Yes, why not, especially since CONFIG_* symbols are not namespaced per-target. Paolo
