On 1/29/19 7:51 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > On Tue, 29 Jan 2019 14:37:47 +0100 > Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> It's either "GNU *Library* General Public License version 2" or >> "GNU Lesser General Public License version *2.1*", but there was >> no "version 2.0" of the "Lesser" license. So assume that version >> 2.1 is meant here. > > I think we can assume that. > > Given that there have been several of these cases (and that there's a > lot of boilerplate in general): Should we adopt SPDX license > identifiers for QEMU, as the Linux kernel did? They also discovered and > fixed some problems/oddities while at it.
I'm also in favor of SPDX license identifiers - their brevity and machine-parsability favors more accurate usage and fewer copy/paste mistake propagation. -- Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
