no-re...@patchew.org writes:

> === OUTPUT BEGIN ===
> 1/8 Checking commit 345a0718e21e (Update linux headers (5.0-rc2))
> WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
> #1646: 
> new file mode 100644
>
> ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
> #3980: FILE: scripts/update-linux-headers.sh:126:
> +^Icp "$tmpdir/include/asm/unistd_n64.h" "$output/linux-headers/asm-mips/"$
>
> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> #3983: FILE: scripts/update-linux-headers.sh:129:
> +        cp "$tmpdir/include/asm/unistd_32.h" 
> "$output/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/"
>
> WARNING: line over 80 characters
> #3984: FILE: scripts/update-linux-headers.sh:130:
> +       cp "$tmpdir/include/asm/unistd_64.h" 
> "$output/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/"
>
> ERROR: code indent should never use tabs
> #3984: FILE: scripts/update-linux-headers.sh:130:
> +^Icp "$tmpdir/include/asm/unistd_64.h" "$output/linux-headers/asm-powerpc/"$
>

I saw these before submitting, however, these are linux headers and we
take them as-is with scripts/update-linux-headers.sh: I don't think it
is worth it to modify these headers just to silence patchew.

-- 
Vitaly

Reply via email to