Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: > On 23 March 2011 14:19, Juan Quintela <quint...@redhat.com> wrote: >> Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote: >> ARM people are sending lots of vmstate changes, I guess/hope that >> somebody is trying to get it working. >> >> /me looks at Peter O:-), hint, hint, ... > > Well, the main thing I care about currently (or did back before > Christmas which is when I sent a patchset to add save/restore > to a pile of ARM devices) is simple save-and-restore for debugging > use. The rest is just that patches don't get through code review > unless they get the vmstate stuff right, and I care about not > being rejected :-) > > I think it's still the case that there are devices in > some of the ARM devboards with no save/restore support > at all. I would really prefer it if the default for a > device was "I do not support this" with the things like > USB where somebody has audited them as genuinely needing > no save/restore code explicitly marked as "this is OK"; > then we could easily determine what needed fixing and > not offer a broken facility to users.
I agree, but that means (again), review of all devices to change the defaults. It is on my ToDo list (but my ToDo list is huge :-( >> Any idea if there are images for testing ARM? > > There are prebuilt images on Aurelien's website for > ARM and others, which is the simplest thing: > http://www.aurel32.net/info/debian_arm_qemu.php That images don't migrate for me at all. Guest got hung after migration, at least some state (probably irq's) are not passed correctly. Later, Juan.
