在 2019/2/4 下午9:30, Markus Armbruster 写道:
Fei Li <lifei1...@126.com> writes:

在 2019/2/1 下午9:04, Markus Armbruster 写道:
Fei Li <lifei1...@126.com> writes:

From: Fei Li <f...@suse.com>

Utilize the existed errp to propagate the error and do the
corresponding cleanup to replace the temporary &error_abort.

Cc: Markus Armbruster <arm...@redhat.com>
Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Fei Li <f...@suse.com>
---
   hw/usb/ccid-card-emulated.c | 15 ++++++++++-----
   1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/hw/usb/ccid-card-emulated.c b/hw/usb/ccid-card-emulated.c
index 0b170f6328..19b4b9a8fa 100644
--- a/hw/usb/ccid-card-emulated.c
+++ b/hw/usb/ccid-card-emulated.c
@@ -544,11 +544,16 @@ static void emulated_realize(CCIDCardState *base, Error 
**errp)
           error_setg(errp, "%s: failed to initialize vcard", 
TYPE_EMULATED_CCID);
           goto out2;
       }
-    /* TODO: let the further caller handle the error instead of abort() here */
-    qemu_thread_create(&card->event_thread_id, "ccid/event", event_thread,
-                       card, QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE, &error_abort);
-    qemu_thread_create(&card->apdu_thread_id, "ccid/apdu", handle_apdu_thread,
-                       card, QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE, &error_abort);
+    if (qemu_thread_create(&card->event_thread_id, "ccid/event", event_thread,
+                           card, QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE, errp) < 0) {
+        goto out2;
+    }
+    if (qemu_thread_create(&card->apdu_thread_id, "ccid/apdu",
+                           handle_apdu_thread, card,
+                           QEMU_THREAD_JOINABLE, errp) < 0) {
+        qemu_thread_join(&card->event_thread_id);
What makes event_thread terminate here?

I'm asking because if it doesn't, the join will hang.
Oops, my neglect..  Could we add a
`qemu_thread_cancel(card->event_thread_id);` here
before the join()?
pthread_cancel() is difficult to use correctly, and we don't use it in
QEMU so far.  Instead, we tell threads to stop, e.g. by setting a flag
the thread checks in its main loop, and making sure the thread actually
loops in bounded time.  How to best achieve that for this thread I don't
know.  Christophe, Marc-André, can you help?
Hi, Christophe, Marc-André,
Would you like to share your views and give some suggestions? :)
That would be very helpful, thanks a lot!

Have a nice day
Fei


Reply via email to