On Tue, Feb 19, 2019 at 02:49:42PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote: > > On 2019/2/18 下午10:46, Wei Xu wrote: > >>Do we allow chain more descriptors than vq size in the case of indirect? > >>According to the spec: > >> > >>" > >> > >>The device limits the number of descriptors in a list through a > >>transport-specific and/or device-specific value. If not limited, > >>the maximum number of descriptors in a list is the virt queue > >>size. > >>" > >> > >>This looks possible, so the above is probably wrong if the max number of > >>chained descriptors is negotiated through a device specific way. > >> > >OK, I will remove this check, while it is necessary to have a limitation > >for indirect descriptor anyway, otherwise it is possible to hit an overflow > >since presumably u16 is used for most number/size in the spec. > > > > Please try to test block and scsi device for you changes as well.
Any idea about what kind of test should be covered? AFAICT, currently packed ring is targeted for virtio-net as discussed during voting spec. Wei > > Thanks > >
