On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 8:36 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 28 March 2011 18:31, Blue Swirl <blauwir...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Peter Maydell <peter.mayd...@linaro.org> 
>> wrote:
>>> Combine the per-machine QEMUMachine struct into the per-machine
>>> sun4*_hwdef struct. This requires some moving around of init functions
>>> to avoid forward references. We also have to move the 'const'
>>> attribute from the whole sun4*_hwdef[] array to the individual fields
>>> of the structure, because QEMUMachine is not const.
>>
>> Maybe QEMUMachine should be made const instead? The data does not ever
>> need to change.
>
> I thought about that, but we need to fill in the 'next' links when
> we do qemu_register_device().

The list could be kept separate from the structure.

> (vl.c also sets machine->max_cpus if it wasn't set. I don't think
> anything else modifies QEMUMachine structure fields.)

The lines after that could be changed so that machine->max_cpus is not
changed. It's not used afterwards.

Reply via email to