On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 08:32:58 -0500 "Jason J. Herne" <jjhe...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 2/4/19 6:13 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > > What I don't understand is why we do the basic sense after an IFCC? > > Wouldn't it make more sense to simply retry the original command in > > that case? > > > > I assumed it might be needed to clear status. It seems not. I'll modify that > code path > accordingly. Yes, a tsch should be enough to clear any pending status. It doesn't clear available sense data, but if you get sense data on an ifcc, the hardware/hypervisor is doing something really really strange :)
