On Thu, 28 Feb 2019 10:59:13 -0500 "Jason J. Herne" <jjhe...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 2/4/19 6:41 AM, Cornelia Huck wrote: > >> @@ -148,6 +370,9 @@ int do_cio(SubChannelId schid, uint32_t ccw_addr, int > >> fmt) > >> continue; > >> } > >> > >> + print_irb_err(&irb); > >> + basic_sense(schid, &sd, sizeof(sd)); > >> + print_eckd_dasd_sense_data(&sd); > > > > I think this should only be printed for actual dasds (and maybe only > > print it if there is actually sense data available)? > > > > Good point. Currently do_cio doesn't have any info on its device type. Should > I pass in > the controller type? Thats the easiest way I can think of to make the > decision. > Sounds reasonable to me!
