On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:27 PM David Kiarie <davidkiar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2019 at 6:23 PM Thomas Huth <th...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 04/03/2019 16.13, David Kiarie wrote: >> > >> > Hi David, >> > >> > On 2/23/19 11:54 AM, David Kiarie wrote: >> > > Signed-off-by: David Kiarie >> > <davidkiar...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:davidkiar...@gmail.com>> >> > > --- >> > > hw/i386/amd_iommu.c | 2 +- >> > > hw/i386/amd_iommu.h | 2 +- >> > > 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 >> > deletions(-) >> > > >> > > diff --git a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c >> > b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c >> > > index 8ad707a..4f179da 100644 >> > > --- a/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c >> > > +++ b/hw/i386/amd_iommu.c >> > > @@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ >> > > * QEMU emulation of AMD IOMMU (AMD-Vi) >> > > * >> > > * Copyright (C) 2011 Eduard - Gabriel >> > Munteanu >> > > - * Copyright (C) 2015 David Kiarie, >> > <davidkiar...@gmail.com >> > <mailto:davidkiar...@gmail.com>> >> > > + * Copyright (C) 2016 David Kiarie >> Kahurani >> > >> > Why do you change the year? Because your >> > work was merged in 2016? >> > >> > >> > no. >> > >> > >> > >> > though, if you have a legitimate issue with the >> > change, you can always air it. >> > >> > >> > you might think random emails are weird but Paolo, i >> > don't expect to see any activity from you, on Qemu repo >> > before this issue is sorted ;-) >> > >> > >> > i mostly don't care about this code but i *wrote* it. if i >> > am not allowed even make such minor(which i not a routine), >> > why shouldn't i ask you to take the files down? >> > >> > >> > or, rather, a small issue turns into a scene about how clean >> > Qemu is. why not take down all my dirty code? >> > >> > >> > look i'm resending this patch and next time we're having this >> > conversation, i'll be defacing qemu. >> > >> > either you have to update my code to what i think it should look like or >> > you have to take down - wtf >> > >> > then you try to cook rubbish over it. >> >> Hey, calm down. Paolo said that he'd queue your patch, so it will >> eventually get applied. But that just might take some time, the >> maintainers only send PULL requests for their queued patches after a >> couple of days. So relax, wait some days, and if your patch still did >> not get applied in a week, then you can start complaining again. >> > > i'll not complain again, i'm make a patch to clean my code from your > codebase. > Qemu have never been important to me like it's important to the maintainers. > > >> >> Thomas >> >