On 3/6/19 1:48 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > The only part I'm now not sure about is whether from the above you want to > keep > fpr_offset() and vsrh_offset(), or whether in the final patch in the series I > can > introduce vsr64_offset() similar to avr64_offset() and switch the callers > over to use it?
I would not keep vsrh_offset and would introduce vsr64_offset. But I would keep fpr_offset, specifically for fpr stuff. If you like, you can have it forward to vsr64_offset(r, high=true). r~
