On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 14:28:42 -0500 "Jason J. Herne" <jjhe...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 3/5/19 1:27 AM, Thomas Huth wrote: > > On 01/03/2019 19.59, Jason J. Herne wrote: > >> + PSW return_psw; /* 0x200 */ > >> + uint8_t irb[64]; /* 0x210 */ > >> + uint64_t sync_enter_timer; /* 0x250 */ > >> + uint64_t async_enter_timer; /* 0x258 */ > >> + uint64_t exit_timer; /* 0x260 */ > >> + uint64_t last_update_timer; /* 0x268 */ > >> + uint64_t user_timer; /* 0x270 */ > >> + uint64_t system_timer; /* 0x278 */ > >> + uint64_t last_update_clock; /* 0x280 */ > >> + uint64_t steal_clock; /* 0x288 */ > >> + PSW return_mcck_psw; /* 0x290 */ > > > > ... but where do these entries between 0x200 and 0x2a0 come from? They > > do not seem to be defined by the Principles of Operation? > > > > Taken from target/s390x/internal.h. I stopped at "/* System info area */". > Now that I'm > looking at it, I'm not sue where these are coming from.... I will remove them > in the next > version. That was coming from an very old version of the lowcore in the Linux kernel... removed from internal.h with a patch queued on s390-next now :)
