On 3/7/19 4:27 PM, Thomas Huth wrote: > On 07/03/2019 15.58, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote: >> Hi Thomas, > > ? -----^ > > I could take the patch for tests/data/acpi/rebuild-expected-aml.sh > through the qtests tree (if Michael or Igor don't want to take it), but > the other patches are not related to qtests...
Oh I misread your tests/[qtest] MAINTAINERS entry, my bad! Still I'm not sure what to do, it is a pain to split it again in 3 different v5 series. It would have been way easier to have all the OpenBSD enter as a single series. If we drop OpenBSD support in the next, these patches become less relevant/important (until some weird OS like Haiku get in again), so I'll wait to see what happens during the next dev cycle. Thanks and sorry for sending that to you at first! Phil.
