On 07/03/19 14:09, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 at 12:56, Paolo Bonzini <pbonz...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> In any case, this wouldn't change; as you suggest below, configure could
>> remain as a front-end (well, in-srcdir builds are not supported by
>> Meson, so "../configure && ninja" perhaps).
> 
> As an aside, it might be a nice idea to drop the in-srcdir
> build altogether for QEMU anyway -- it's not really a very
> good idea and it means our build system has to cope with two
> different ways of working to no particularly useful end.

I was actually going to propose that, but I was afraid of throwing two
bombs in the same day. :)

> Of the various hosts I do builds on:
>  * OSX is 2.7 only
>  * the ppc64 box in the gcc compile farm is 2.7 and 3.4
>    ("Centos 7.5.1804")
>  * the aarch64 box in the gcc compile farm is 2.7 and 3.4
>    ("Ubuntu 14.04.5 LTS", aka trusty)

OS X will need to get Python 3 from Homebrew sooner or later anyway.

Trusty does have a python3.5 package, perhaps you could ask the
maintainers to install it.

CentOS 7 doesn't have "native" Python 3 (even the 3.4 version you have
there is probably coming from Fedora) but it has software collections,
where you have to do "scl enable rh-python35 './configure && make'".
You can check if scl and the rh-python35 software collections are
already installed.

Paolo

Reply via email to