On 3/13/19 2:25 PM, Eric Blake wrote:
> On 3/13/19 3:46 AM, Kamal Heib wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Kamal Heib <kamalhe...@gmail.com>
>> ---
>> hw/rdma/rdma_backend.c | 18 +++++++++---------
>> hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_cmd.c | 2 +-
>> hw/rdma/vmw/pvrdma_qp_ops.c | 2 +-
>> 3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> {0} is standard C (but some versions of clang have a bug that it
> mistakenly warns for certain structs); {} is an extension (but one that
> both gcc and clang support). Did you hit the actual clang bug that
> requires this change, or are you only doing it for consistency?
>
I'm doing that for consistency, because some parts of the code already using {}
while other parts aren't, so this patch makes sure that all of them are aligned
to the same convention.
